In recent
decades, globalization is a term that all of us are familiar with. The ideas
behind global citizenship are recognized by most of the people. However, it is
not always easy to take actual practices regarding to the attainment of global
citizenship.
In the
article “Theorizing Global Citizenship”, a several barriers to the attainment
of global citizenship were identified. For example, is it possible for us to
have global citizenship prior to national citizenship? The differences between
national governance and global governance are national governance usually focus
on their own narrow national interests and only maintain their own national identity.
For global governance, they foster a global identity and regards universal human
rights as an important issue. A typical example is China, where people only
have own national identity, seldom have an open mind to foster a transnational
identity. In some communist countries where human rights are not sustained, how
can we expect the people to develop a de-facto double citizenship in a global sense?
The lack of human rights are also affected by poverty, the world is surrounded
by problems like scarcity and economic inequalities, it is impossible to
develop global identity if we cannot solve the issues, however, there is a
certain level of difficulties in eliminating the poverty, this cause one of the
main obstacles for the attainment of global citizenship.
In the
article, “Education for Global Citizenship and Social Responsibility”, Education
is also another challenge that for us to be a global-level citizen. My own
educational experiences did not allow me to understand or reach the global
issues before joining this course, I seldom contribute or participate in the
world actively. I only encountered knowledge from textbooks in high school and
seldom have global consciousness on what is really happening in the world.
However, after I came to Australia to have university and go travel in
different countries, personal experiences allows me to have a new perspective
and lead me to question or evaluated the new information I came across. In my
opinion, I would agree that formal education is the foundation for us to
develop global consciousness, however personal experiences and active engagement
and participate would be more important.
Travelling is also a self-education
process which one may develop its own perspective of global sense. However, we
should learn how to travel as a traveler rather than a tourist. Daniel Vera has
raised some good points of defining what the difference is between travelers
and tourists. Tourists are like most of the people, they join customized
tourists tours, live in luxury hotels and have good food. But travelers are global
citizens or inherently engaged citizens and will look into the culture of the
place beyond their comfort zone.
Most of the people rarely experience
the culture in a truthful perspective during travel. For me, the one of the
first time I’ve been a traveler is when I came to Australia. I came to
Australia three years ago for studying, and I’ve experience the unique culture and
beliefs here and participate freely in Australia’s national life. I found out
that the culture have a big different from my home country, Australia is more
peaceful and people are more polite, they all have a spirit of equality and
freedom of speech and I’ve learnt how to understand other person and try
standing in his/her shoes.
Travelling is civic engagement where
we can learn how to engage with a variety of communities and allows us to develop
new connections, relationships or sensibilities. It gives us an opportunity to
explore within ourselves and understand our values.
沒有留言:
張貼留言